on Chainage 2.100 of Talla Ramgarh Ratighat motor road (Sri Arvindo Sarni Motor Road).
In District Nanital Under CD Nainital Division
Critical Report on Bridge Condition
Form Filled By Suresh Singh Dangwal [42270313M00208]
Inspection Team
"Bridge inspection "
(Suresh Singh Dangwal)
Additional Assistant Engineer Civil
on May 24, 2026
Detail Report
| # | Parameter | Problem ? | How Bad? | How Much? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ROAD APPROCHES AND DECK Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| A- ROAD SURFACE NEAR BRIDGE | |||||
| a) Bumpy road surface near bridge? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| B- DRAINAGE | |||||
| a) Badly built road drainage near bridge? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Blocked or damaged road drains? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Water on the deck? | Yes | Bad | Some Qty | 5 | |
| d) Blocked or damaged deck drains? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| C- WEARING COAT | |||||
| CONCRETE WEARING COURSE | |||||
| a) Cracking? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Spalling? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| c) Reinforcement exposed? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| e) Wear of surface due to small stones? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| D- KERBS & FOOTPATHS | |||||
| a) Loose railing fixtures? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| a) Damaged or loose kerbs? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| 2 | PARAPETS, RAILINGS AND CRASH BARRIERS Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| a) Impact damaged? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Loose or damaged fixings? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Loose base of posts? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Damaged coatirig or paint on steel surface? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Corrosion on steel surface? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| f) Cracking on Masonary Parapets? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| g) Movement or bending of parapet? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| h) Poor pointing/ Plaster on parapet? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| i) Deterioration of bricks or stones? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| 3 | EXPANSION JOINT AT ABUTMENTS & PIERS Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| a) Damage to concrete of deck end or dirt wall near joint? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Debris or vegetation in joint? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Loose or damaged fixtures? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| d) Damage or corrosion to metal parts? | Yes | Bad | Much Qty | 6 | |
| e) Damage to rubber waterseals? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| 4 | RIVER Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| A- BLOCKAGES IN WATERWAY | |||||
| a) Debris against piers or abutments? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| b) Remains of old bridge under or upstream of the bridge? | Yes | Bad | Not Much Qty | 4 | |
| c) Fencing or buildings under bridge? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| d) Trees or bushes.growing under bridge? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| B- CHANGE IN RIVER COURSE | |||||
| a) River changing path upstream of bridge? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) New islands forming upstream of bridge? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| C- RIVER TRAINING WORKS | |||||
| a) River attack beyond the upstream end of river training works? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Damage to walls? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Loss of pitching? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Damage to crates, timber, fencing, etc.? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Damage to trees? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| 5 | SUPERSTRUCTURE Component Weightage 60 | ||||
| SUPERSTRUCTURE -1 | |||||
| TYPE - CONCRETE | |||||
| General | |||||
| a) Impact damage to girders, trusses or bracings? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Debris or vegetation on beams, girders, trusses bracings or joints? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Water coming through the deck? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Water from the deck drainage flowing on to girders, trusses, beams or bracings? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Not enough vertical & horizontal clearances? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| CONCRETE BEAMS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Corrosion of reinforcement? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| CONCRETE UNDERSIDE OF DECK | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| c) Reinforcement corrosion? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| e) Less cover to reinforcement? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| SUPERSTRUCTURE -2 | |||||
| TYPE - CONCRETE | |||||
| General | |||||
| a) Impact damage to girders, trusses or bracings? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Debris or vegetation on beams, girders, trusses bracings or joints? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Water coming through the deck? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| d) Water from the deck drainage flowing on to girders, trusses, beams or bracings? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Not enough vertical & horizontal clearances? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| CONCRETE BEAMS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Corrosion of reinforcement? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| CONCRETE UNDERSIDE OF DECK | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Reinforcement corrosion? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Less cover to reinforcement? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| SUPERSTRUCTURE -3 | |||||
| TYPE - CONCRETE | |||||
| General | |||||
| a) Impact damage to girders, trusses or bracings? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Debris or vegetation on beams, girders, trusses bracings or joints? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| c) Water coming through the deck? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Water from the deck drainage flowing on to girders, trusses, beams or bracings? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Not enough vertical & horizontal clearances? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| CONCRETE BEAMS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Corrosion of reinforcement? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| CONCRETE UNDERSIDE OF DECK | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Reinforcement corrosion? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Less cover to reinforcement? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| SUPERSTRUCTURE -4 | |||||
| TYPE - CONCRETE | |||||
| General | |||||
| a) Impact damage to girders, trusses or bracings? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| b) Debris or vegetation on beams, girders, trusses bracings or joints? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Water coming through the deck? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Water from the deck drainage flowing on to girders, trusses, beams or bracings? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| e) Not enough vertical & horizontal clearances? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| CONCRETE BEAMS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Corrosion of reinforcement? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| CONCRETE UNDERSIDE OF DECK | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Reinforcement corrosion? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Less cover to reinforcement? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| 6 | BEARINGS Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| RUBBER BEARINGS | |||||
| a) Debris or vegetation around bearings? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Bad drainage? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Not enough room for the bridge span to move? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Bearing not seated properly? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Bridge span not seated properly on bearing? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| f) Damaged bedding mortar? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| g) Damaged or loose earthquake restraints? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| RUBBER BEARINGS | |||||
| a) Splitting, tearing or cracking of rubber? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Damaged bedding mortar? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| 7 | Right Side ABUTMENT, WING WALLS & RETAINING WALLS Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| A- GENERAL | |||||
| a) Erosion or scour at abutment? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Damage to foundation? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| c) Movement of abutment? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| d) Debris against abutment? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| e) Vegetation growing on-or in abutment? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| f) Scour near to retaining walls? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| g) Movement of retaining walls? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| h) Water leaking down through the expansion joint? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| B- DRAINAGE SYSTEM | |||||
| a) Not enough weepholes? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Weepholes not working? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| c) Water leaking through the abutment? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| C- CONCRETE WALLS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Corrosion of reinforcement? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| D- MASONRY WALLS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Bulging? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Poor pointing? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Deterioration of bricks or stones? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| E- EMBANKMENTS AND FILL IN FRONT OF ABUTMENT | |||||
| a) Scour at base of slopes? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Slippage of fill? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Erosion of fill? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Cracking of road or embankment edge? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Piping failure of fill? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| 8 | Left Side ABUTMENT, WING WALLS & RETAINING WALLS Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| A- GENERAL | |||||
| a) Erosion or scour at abutment? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Damage to foundation? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Movement of abutment? | Yes | Bad | Not Much Qty | 4 | |
| d) Debris against abutment? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Vegetation growing on-or in abutment? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| f) Scour near to retaining walls? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| g) Movement of retaining walls? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| h) Water leaking down through the expansion joint? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| B- DRAINAGE SYSTEM | |||||
| a) Not enough weepholes? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Weepholes not working? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Water leaking through the abutment? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| C- CONCRETE WALLS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Spalling? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Corrosion of reinforcement? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Poor concrete? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| D- MASONRY WALLS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Bulging? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Poor pointing? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Deterioration of bricks or stones? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| E- EMBANKMENTS AND FILL IN FRONT OF ABUTMENT | |||||
| a) Scour at base of slopes? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Slippage of fill? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Erosion of fill? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Cracking of road or embankment edge? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Piping failure of fill? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| 9 | Embankments Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| A- STONE PITCHING SLOPE PROTECTION | |||||
| a) Cracking? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Poor pointing? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| c) Scour or erosion at edge? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Pieces broken off? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| e) Piping failure of fill? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| B- SLOPE PROTECTION WITH CRATES | |||||
| a) Not much movement of crates? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| b) Damage to crates or ties? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| C- PITCHING SLOPE PROTECTION WITH CONCRETE BLOCKS | |||||
| a) Slope getting washed out? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Settlement? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| 10 | RIVER BED Component Weightage 10 | ||||
| A- BED PROTECTION AND APRONS | |||||
| a) Large holes in the river bed? | Yes | Bad | Not Much Qty | 4 | |
| b) Loss of material | Yes | Bad | Not Much Qty | 4 | |
| c) Crates broken away from pier or abutment? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| d) Damage to wires or ties? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| B- STONE PITCHING OR CONCRETE BED PROTECTION AND APRONS | |||||
| a) Scour at edge? | Yes | Bad | Not Much Qty | 4 | |
| b) Cracking? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| c) Spalling or stones missing? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| d) Erosion of surface? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| e) Corrosion of reinforcement? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| 11 | PIERs Component Weightage 60 | ||||
| Pier-1 | |||||
| TYPE - MASONRY PIERS | |||||
| a) Scour near base of pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Not Much Qty | 1 | |
| b) Damage to foundations? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Movement of pier? | Yes | Bad | Not Much Qty | 4 | |
| d) Impact damage? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Vegetation growirig on pier? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| f) Water Leaking past expansion joint | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| MASONRY PIERS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Poor pointing? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| c) Deterioration of masonry | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| Pier-2 | |||||
| TYPE - MASONRY PIERS | |||||
| a) Scour near base of pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Damage to foundations? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Movement of pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| d) Impact damage? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Vegetation growirig on pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| f) Water Leaking past expansion joint | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| MASONRY PIERS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Poor pointing? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Deterioration of masonry | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| Pier-3 | |||||
| TYPE - MASONRY PIERS | |||||
| a) Scour near base of pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Damage to foundations? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| c) Movement of pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| d) Impact damage? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| e) Vegetation growirig on pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| f) Water Leaking past expansion joint | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| MASONRY PIERS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Poor pointing? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Deterioration of masonry | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| Pier-4 | |||||
| TYPE - MASONRY PIERS | |||||
| a) Scour near base of pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| b) Damage to foundations? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Movement of pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| d) Impact damage? | NO Problem | -- | -- | 0 | |
| e) Vegetation growirig on pier? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| f) Water Leaking past expansion joint | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| MASONRY PIERS | |||||
| a) Cracking? | Yes | Not So Bad | Much Qty | 3 | |
| b) Poor pointing? | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
| c) Deterioration of masonry | Yes | Not So Bad | Some Qty | 2 | |
End of Report